Nowadays the modelling of structures with timber walls with a finite element software could be complicated: in particular the correct evaluation of wall lateral stiffness is difficult to achieve since it depends on different contributions (shear deformations of the walls, deformations of the connections, rigid body rocking due to hold-down deformation…) which are difficult to define in the model.

On the other hand, with the software**TimberTech Buildings** the definition and the modelling of timber walls (CLT or platform frame walls)** ** results easy because **the “assembly” of all the components of the wall is up to the implemented numerical models derived by the research conducted at the University of Trento**.

The model implemented in the software is able to consider all the stiffness components in a timber wall and its connections. A description of the model was published in the paper “Daniele Casagrande, Simone Rossi, Tiziano Sartori, Roberto Tomasi, Proposal of an analytical procedure and a simplified numerical model for elastic response of single-storey timber shear-walls, in Constrution and Building Materials (2015)”.

On the other hand, with the software

The model implemented in the software is able to consider all the stiffness components in a timber wall and its connections. A description of the model was published in the paper “Daniele Casagrande, Simone Rossi, Tiziano Sartori, Roberto Tomasi, Proposal of an analytical procedure and a simplified numerical model for elastic response of single-storey timber shear-walls, in Constrution and Building Materials (2015)”.

Case study

This section shows a comparison between a modelling of a light-frame wall with a finite element software and a modelling with the software TimberTech Buildings. The aim of this comparison is to calculate and compare the several stiffness contributions given by the elements forming the wall.

A platform-frame wall is made of timber studs and beams braced with sheating panels used to transfer the horizontal loads to the foundations.

A platform-frame wall is made of timber studs and beams braced with sheating panels used to transfer the horizontal loads to the foundations.

The elastic horizontal displacement of a light timber frame wall subjected to an horizontal force can be obtained by adding the following contributions of deformation.

Displacement due to the connections between the sheathing and the frame

Displacement due to the sheathing panels

Displacement due to the rigid body translation

Displacement due to the rigid body translation

Modelling timber light-frame walls through finite element software is very onerous and complicated. As shown in the following figure, to evaluate correctly the horizontal stiffness of the wall, you need to use:

- “
**frame**” elements to model the frame elements; - “
**shell**” elements to model the sheathing panel; - “
**link**” elements to model the connections between the sheating and the frame. Every nail is modelled with a link with the real stiffness of the fastener; - “
**link**” elements to simulate the hold down and the angle brackets.

Modelling with TimberTech Building is very simple and fast. The user has to define the geometrical and mechanical properties for each wall tipology.

In this case study there is a comparison between the software TimberTech Buildings and a finite element software for a wall with a length of 2 m and an height of 3 m. The wall presents the following characteristics:

- the frame has a thickness of 160 mm, the width of the studs is equal to 100 mm and the spacing between studs is 1000 mm;
- the sheathing panel is an OSB/2 with a thickness of 12,5 mm. The nails stiffness is 918 N/mm. The external fasteners spacing is 100 mm and the internal fasteners spacing is 200 mm;
- the wall is restrained to the foundation with an hold-down with a stiffness of 19977 kN/m and with two angle brackets with a stiffness of 52186 kN/m.

Comparison between the results obtained with Timbertech Buildings and the results obtained with a finite element software

Deformation contributions obtained with TimberTech Buildings

From the table above, we can see how the results of the analytical model implemented in **TimbertechBuildings** are very similar to the results obtained with a finite element software.

We achieved a wall stiffness that is very close to those obtained with a finite element software in spite of a more simple modelling of the wall.

In the table above, it is shown that the contribution of deformation given by the **rigid body translation** is **negligible**. On the other hand, **the fasteners deformations and the rigid body rocking (hold-down connection) are very important**.

This section shows a comparison between a modelling of a CLT wall with a finite element software and a modelling with the software TimberTech Buildings. The aim of this comparison is to calculate and compare the several stiffness contributions given by the elements forming the wall.

The elastic horizontal displacement of a jointed CLT wall subjected to a horizontal force can be obtained by adding the following contributions of deformation:

- joints deformation;
- panel shear deformation;
- rigid body translation (angle brackets);
- rigid body rotation (hold-down).

As shown in the following figure, to evaluate correctly the horizontal stiffness of the wall, you need to use:

- “
**shell**” elements to model the CLT panels; **“link”**elements to model the**joints**between the CLT panels;**“link**” elements to simulate the hold down and the angle brackets.

Modelling a jointed CLT wall with TimberTech Building is very simple and fast. The user has to define the geometrical and mechanical properties for each wall tipology.

Joint tipology

Joint properties

From the table above, we can see how the results of the analytical model implemented in **TimbertechBuildings** are very similar to the results obtained with a finite element software.

We achieved a wall stiffness that is very close to those obtained with a finite element software in spite of a more simple modelling of the wall.

In the table above, it is shown that the contribution of deformation given by the **rigid body translation** is **negligible**. On the other hand, **the fasteners deformations and the rigid body rocking (hold-down connection) are very important**.

From the table above, we can see how the results of the analytical model implemented in **TimbertechBuildings** are very similar to the results obtained with a finite element software. We achieved a **wall stiffness that is very nearly to the each one obtained with a finite element software** in spite of a **more simple modelling** of the wall.

This is some text inside of a div block.